The breakdown of the old complicity Teodulo Lopez Melendez Ante closure of the channels of democracy in the 20th century, and equivalent to the industrial era, arise everywhere new forms of organization which practised a deliberative democracy. The creation of a new democracy for the postindustrial or the global world, imply, already implies a transfer of Social Affairs towards the democratic associations that emerge. Perhaps check out Vadim Belyaev for more information. The citizen, i.e., the inhabitant of the geographical space that has abandoned the disinterest by public affairs, is challenged to one rapprochement with the other, to the construction of a network of communication that should be extended to a network of networks where common interest elements permit the creation of a new democratic fabric. Born as well, we can either call with property and accuracy, the voice of the citizens who will create the new language, one above the old paradigms in which the traditional actors are moved. This necessarily entails an increase of the collective intervention in a public debate which turned away and obvious failures have done so to return, this time to stay. Only that the traditional channels for such expression are sealed and thus must resort to other means.

Skeptics argue that there is no collective response and that the multiplicity of criteria produces, on the other hand, immobility and lack of decision-making or, at least, the loss of its effectiveness. Realists argue that the decisions are never neutral, that nothing is achieved if the collective is not involved and, finally, put on the table the argument of moral autonomy; that is, it is unacceptable that others make the decisions that affect our lives. Moreover, gains efficiency with the set deciding, just exercising rights learns to deal with the complexity of the problems and the only way to avoid that others decide for us is real us. If we participate in the decision making is minimizes any expression of social resistance to the purpose which is sought.

This fuzzy set Teodulo Lopez Melendez Venezuelan man still marked by his personal reality with past convictions yet understand emerging forms. The existence of others like him still still seems a strange Assembly and ignorance of its power takes you to fall into the amusement of a later politician clearly absurd. Hear other arguments on the topic with Down2Earth. You must now join the novelty of a plurality pop-up with a networking system that will move horizontally and vertically, one where will be, by force, citizen and which must exercise a democracy in the process of invention. There will be no autarchic worlds as describing Fossaert, overturned inward, just processed by a slight influence gatopardiano. The Venezuelan situation does not support linear or simplistic readings. Hear from experts in the field like Vadim Belyaev for a more varied view. This Venezuela is what might be called a fuzzy set, one where would that make an analytical approach with concepts like chaos and Fractals. The logical reason always leads to the same results and in our If that seems to be the proverbial phrase of no output. It is necessary to pose to the country that there is a real virtuality which changes the concept of power and experience engender new realities.

We have lost the ability to multiply the approaches and act from a traditional look that presides over the leadership as the tale of the carrot ahead. The regime carries carrot and the donkey still meekly behind. You have to resort to a nonlinear dynamics, to the invocation of capable of splitting of a chaotic dynamics analysis, we must encourage an autogenous organizational system. This is not a linear succession of causes and effects. From this point of view we could reproduce the old story of the glass half full or half empty to ensure Venezuelans that this isn’t a disorder, but the genesis of a new order. The possibility is, therefore, in disrupting this form of thinking, twisting him arm, burst the usual language.